Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effect of liraglutide biosimilar vs. reference liraglutide on weight reduction in T2DM patients with obesity: post hoc analysis of phase III trial

Cardiovascular Diabetology – Endocrinology Reports volume 11, Article number: 6 (2025) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Obesity is a chronic metabolic disease of global concern, often associated with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Global guidelines recommend holistic approach for T2DM management by addressing the associated comorbidities. Here, we have conducted a post-hoc evaluation of Liraglutide biosimilar Phase III trial on weight reduction and glycaemic benefits in Indian T2DM patients with obesity in comparison to reference liraglutide.

Methods

We have conducted a post-hoc analysis of Liraglutide biosimilar Phase III trial on weight reduction in Indian T2DM patients with obesity in comparison to reference liraglutide. We evaluated weight reduction and HbA1c improvement in Indian T2DM patients (BMI > 25 kg/m2) from baseline to week 24. Group A – Intervention arm: Liraglutide Biosimilar in T2DM patients with obesity Group B – Control arm: Reference Liraglutide in T2DM patients with obesity. Primary endpoint was mean change in body weight from baseline to week 24.

Results

179 T2DM patients (BMI > 25 Kg/m2 and above) who satisfied the inclusion criteria, were included in this post-hoc analysis. The mean BMI of T2DM patients with obesity in Biosimilar Liraglutide arm was 29.8 ± 4.6 kg/m2 and that in the Reference Liraglutide arm it was 29.8 ± 4.8 kg/m2. Significant mean weight reduction (Mean ± SD) of 5.5 ± 1.2 kg (7.3 ± 1.7%) and 7.1 ± 2.6 kg (8.9 ± 1.7%) (p < 0.001) was demonstrated by both biosimilar liraglutide and reference liraglutide respectively. However, weight reduction was comparable across both the groups at week 24 (p = 0.71). Likewise, glycaemic parameters (HbA1c, FPG and PPG) significantly improved in both the treatment arms (p < 0.001). However, they were comparable across the groups at week 24 with a p value of 0.89, 0.43 and 0.17 for HbA1c, FPG and PPG respectively.

Conclusion

Biosimilar Liraglutide at a dose of up to 1.8 mg was non-inferior to reference Liraglutide and resulted in significant weight reduction and glycemic control (HbA1c, FPG and PPG) in Indian T2DM patients with obesity.

Introduction

Obesity is chronic metabolic disease that has emerged as a global public health problem [1]. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in association with obesity, usually known as “Diabesity” is an alarming combination that significantly increases both morbidity as well as mortality [2]. Patients’ health-related quality of life is further compromised by various obesity-related comorbidities including dyslipidaemia, hypertension, Metabolic dysfunction Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD), Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA), Cardiovascular Disease (CVD), Cancer, Osteoarthritis and others [3] More than 88% of People living with Diabetes (PwD) are suffering from overweight or obesity [4]. Recently published data from the ICMR-INDIAB 17 study stated the prevalence of generalized obesity (BMI > 25 kg/m2) and that of abdominal obesity (waist circumference > 90 cm for men and > 80 cm for women) at 28.6% and 39.5% respectively [5].

Holistic management for diabetes includes lifestyle modification and dietary changes combined with physical activity and behavioural interventions. These recommendations are advocated by American Diabetes Association (ADA), European Association for Study of Diabetes (EASD), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) for management of T2DM patients with obesity [6, 7]. Patient centric approach and holistic management of T2DM with obesity can help improve patient outcomes in the presence of “Diabesity” [8]. Weight loss of 5 to 10% has been shown to reduce complications related to obesity and improve quality of life along with significant health benefits [9–11].

By virtue of their extra glycaemic benefits, specifically by promoting weight reduction and satiety control, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) are recommended as the 1st line therapy by most international organizations, for weight management in T2DM patients [7]. Liraglutide, a GLP-1RA, is approved for chronic weight management (at a dose of 3.0 mg) in individuals with BMI ≥ 27 kg/m2 with one weight-related comorbidity or in people with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) [12, 13]. The SCALE clinical trial [13] documented weight loss benefits of Liraglutide with 3 mg dose in patients with obesity with or without diabetes However, the same trial also documented a significant weight loss of 5 kg with 1.8 mg liraglutide. Likewise, literature has demonstrated the beneficial effects of low dose Liraglutide (1.8 mg) on weight reduction [14, 15]. Recently, Liraglutide Biosimilar has received marketing authorization for management of T2DM in India at a maximum dose of up to 1.8 mg. Phase III trial evaluated the glycemic efficacy of the Liraglutide Biosimilar in comparison to the reference Liraglutide on background Oral Antidiabetic Drug (OAD) therapy [16]. However, to evaluate its effect in T2DM patients with obesity we conducted this post hoc analysis of Phase III trial.

Materials and methods

Study design

The study design of Phase III clinical trial of Liraglutide biosimilar in comparison with reference liraglutide, their detailed methods along with the primary results have been published previously [16] wherein 17 clinical trial sites throughout India participated in this randomized, open label, parallel group, two-arm study. Assessors were blinded and the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of liraglutide Biosimilar developed by Levim Biotech LLP, was compared to the reference liraglutide in the treatment of T2DM patients already on a background stable therapy of other oral hypoglycaemic agents (CTRI/ 2022/02/040261).

The study population consisted of T2DM patients of either sex, from 18 to 65 years of age with baseline HbA1c levels between 7 and 10%. A total of 256 T2DM patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive either liraglutide biosimilar (1.2 mg/day or up titrated to the maximum dose of 1.8 mg/day) or reference liraglutide (1.2 mg/day or up titrated to the maximum dose of 1.8 mg/day), both in addition to standard-of-care therapy. The treatment duration was of 24 weeks excluding the screening period. Flow diagram depicting the study design is given in Fig. 1.

All patients enrolled were initiated on either Biosimilar or Reference Liraglutide at a starting dose of 0.6 mg initially. Dose titration was done after minimum of 1 week of treatment with 0.6 mg dose for both treatment arms. Following the 1st dose titration to 1.2 mg, the dose was up titrated by the investigators to 1.8 mg to achieve better glycaemic control if targets were not met, subject to tolerance/side effects. Dose escalation, (to 1.8 mg dose) was done after at least 1 week of treatment with 1.2 mg dose based on the 6-point self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) profile values. Patients who tolerated 1.2 mg dose and who were being considered for titrating the dose to 1.8 mg were instructed to do SMBG after each meal i.e. breakfast, lunch and dinner. The clinical study protocol, informed consent forms, and all other study-related documents were approved by independent ethics committees or institutional review boards, as applicable. The study was conducted in compliance with the protocol, the ethical principles were followed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, International Council for Harmonization (ICH) consolidated Guideline the New Drugs and Clinical Trial Rules, 2019 (CDSCO, India) and other applicable regulatory requirements.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Liraglutide biosimilar Phase III Study flow diagram. HbA1c% (rhombus) was measured at baseline (screening), week 12, week 18 and week 24. Source: Supplementary material, Phase III trial of Liraglutide Biosimilar, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, Volume 207, 111,034

Full size image

Subgroup for post hoc analysis

Post hoc analysis of the Liraglutide biosimilar phase III trial was done to evaluate its effect on weight and HbA1c reduction across both the treatment arms from baseline to week 24 in T2DM patients with obesity. Study participants with BMI > 25 kg/m2 were classified as to be suffering from obesity (Asia Pacific guidelines for obesity) [17] These individuals were divided into two groups as follows: Group A – Intervention arm: Liraglutide Biosimilar in T2DM patients with obesity and Group B – Control arm: Reference Liraglutide in T2DM patients with obesity. The subgroups included for analysis in our study are depicted in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Post hoc analysis study flow diagram

Full size image

Study endpoints

The primary efficacy endpoint for this post hoc analysis was mean change in body weight from baseline to week 24 across both the treatment arms. The secondary endpoints included mean changes from baseline to week 24 in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and post-prandial glucose (PPG).

Statistical analysis

Raw data of the study participants was extracted and tabulated as per BMI stratification. We used SPSS software version 23, San Diego CA, for data analysis. Demographic characteristics of all the patients were captured and baseline comparison was done. Continuous variables were represented as Mean ± SD. Post normality assessment, within group analysis was done using ‘paired t’ test while intergroup comparison was done using independent sample t test. A p value of < 0.05 was statistically significant.

Results

Demographic characteristics

179 T2DM patients with obesity (BMI 25 Kg/m2 and above) who satisfied the inclusion criteria, were included amongst the 256 patients from phase III clinical trial for Liraglutide Biosimilar. 87 patients received biosimilar liraglutide while 92 patients were on reference liraglutide. The mean BMI of T2DM patients with obesity in the Biosimilar Liraglutide arm was 29.8 ± 4.6 kg/m2 and in the Reference Liraglutide, arm was 29.8 ± 4.8 kg/m2. A total of 97 patients were on 1.2 mg dose (53 on biosimilar liraglutide and 44 on reference liraglutide), while the remaining 82 patients required dose up titration to 1.8 mg (34 on biosimilar liraglutide and 48 on reference liraglutide). Baseline demographic characteristics of patients have been mentioned in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the study participants as per the subgroups
Full size table

Weight parameters

The mean weight of patients in both the treatment arms at baseline and week 24 has been given in Table 2. Average weight reduction of 5.5 ± 1.2 kg (7.3 ± 1.7%) and 7.1 ± 2.6 kg (8.9 ± 1.7%) from baseline to week 24, was demonstrated by biosimilar liraglutide and reference liraglutide respectively (Mean ± SD). Treatment with biosimilar liraglutide was associated with a weight loss of at least 5%, 10% and 15% in 21%, 8% and 2% of the patients respectively. Likewise, with reference liraglutide, 17% and 2% patients lost at least 5% and 10% body weight respectively, while none of the patient could achieve a weight loss of over 15%. Both biosimilar and reference liraglutide demonstrated significant weight reduction from baseline to end of study. (p < 0.001). However, weight reduction between both the groups at week 24 with a p = 0.71 was comparable. The results are demonstrated in Fig. 3 and tabulated in Table 3.

Table 2 Change in weight in T2DM patients with obesity (BMI > 25 kg/m2) (Intra group)
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Change in weight in T2DM patients with obesity (BMI > 25 kg/m2) (Intra group)

Full size image
Table 3 Weight reduction in T2DM patients with obesity (BMI > 25 kg/m2) (Inter group)
Full size table

Glycemic parameters

Glycemic parameters like HbA1c, FPG and PPG demonstrated a significant change from baseline to week 24 across both Liraglutide biosimilar and Reference liraglutide study arms. (p < 0.001). The improvement in glycemic parameters have been represented in Fig. 4 and depicted in Table 4. However, HbA1c, FPG and PPG across Liraglutide biosimilar and Reference liraglutide at week 24 were comparable. The p value for HbA1c, FPG and PPG was 0.89, 0.43 and 0.17 respectively (Table 5; Fig. 5).

Table 4 Glycemic parameters in T2DM patients with obesity (Intra group)
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

HbA1c changes across T2DM patients with obesity (BMI > 25 kg/m2)

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

FPG and PPG changes across T2DM patients with obesity (BMI > 25 kg/m2)

Full size image
Table 5 Glycemic parameters across T2DM patients with obesity (Inter group)
Full size table

Discussion

Obesity and T2DM are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Major guidelines throughout the globe have recommended GLP-1RA for management of Obesity alone, as well as for T2DM with Obesity. Globally, Liraglutide has been extensively studied for its extra glycaemic benefits mainly pertaining to weight loss. The primary objective of our post hoc analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of Levim Biotech LLP developed Biosimilar liraglutide compared to the Reference liraglutide in weight reduction over 24 weeks’ duration in T2DM patients along with obesity. Based on post hoc results that we have analysed, Biosimilar liraglutide was found to be non-inferior to the Reference liraglutide with respect to change in mean weight and HbA1c values from baseline to end of the study.

Our results with lower dose of Liraglutide Biosimilar (1.8 mg) significantly reduced weight from baseline to end of study. SCALE randomized clinical trial program evaluated the efficacy of different doses of Liraglutide on weight reduction in patients with obesity [13]. Liraglutide low dose (1.8 mg) and high dose (3 mg) was compared with placebo, in terms of absolute weight reduction. Patients on 3 mg Liraglutide demonstrated 6.4 kg weight loss, while those on 1.8 mg lost 5 kg weight. The weight loss with 1.8 mg with Biosimilar Liraglutide in T2DM patients with obesity in our study was 5.5 kg. Weight reduction in terms of percentage was 4.7% observed with 1.8 mg liraglutide dose in SCALE clinical trial. Our study demonstrated 7.9% weight reduction with 1.8 mg dose. The findings for weight reduction were consistent with the findings from the SCALE clinical trial using 1.8 mg liraglutide.

Globally, 3 mg Liraglutide has been approved for management of Obesity in addition to dietary modification and lifestyle interventions. It has been observed that higher the dose of GLP-1RA, greater is its weight reducing efficacy. Weight reduction of around 8.3% has been observed with Liraglutide 3 mg dose in the western population. Our study demonstrated a weight loss of 7.9% with 1.8 mg dose, comparable with the degree of weight reduction achieved with higher dose of liraglutide [13]. Higher GLP-1RA dose is particularly effective in western population who have higher baseline BMI with higher body fat content [18].

Studies have shown that use of higher dose of GLP-1RA might lead to lean muscle mass wasting to certain extent in comparison to the amount of fat tissue being lost [19]. Especially in Asian Indian T2DM patients who typically have a phenotype characterized by lean body composition with abdominal obesity [20]. In such phenotype, even lower dose of Liraglutide (1.8 mg) is associated with considerable weight reduction [12, 17]. Moreover, higher prevalence of overweight and prediabetes in Asian Indians point to an ongoing acceleration of both obesity and T2DM. It is of particular interest that Asian Indians are more likely than white Caucasians to develop obesity and diabetes at younger age with quick disease progression. Keeping this perspective in mind and all the non-communicable diseases (NCD) that come along with T2DM patients with obesity, body weight reduction along with adequate glycaemic control offers a promising approach for holistic management of T2DM patients with obesity [21, 22].

In addition to all the factors discussed above, expensive cost of GLP-1RA medications was an important hurdle for many patients in India. The average annual expenses spent on Diabetes related healthcare costs is around Rs. 30 thousand, which translates to Rs. 2500 per month [23]. Considering the price sensitive Indian diabetes market, this amount is beyond reach for many diabetics and thus warrants the use and acceptance of more economical biosimilar versions of available GLP-1RA medications. Liraglutide biosimilar is priced at 1/3rd the cost of reference liraglutide, addressing the core issue of financial implications associated with the use of GLP-1RA therapy. Therefore, Liraglutide biosimilar is both an economical and effective treatment modality for Indian Diabetic patients suffering from overweight and obesity, with definitive weight loss benefits.

Conclusion

Biosimilar Liraglutide at a dose of 1.8 mg resulted in significant weight reduction and glycemic control (HbA1c, FPG and PPG) from baseline to end of study in T2DM patients with obesity. The weight reduction was comparable to reference liraglutide at the end of study.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Okunogbe A, Nugent R, Spencer G, Ralston J, Wilding J. Economic impacts of overweight and obesity: current and future estimates for eight countries. BMJ Glob Heal. 2021 1;6(10):e006351.

  2. Raghavan S, Vassy JL, Ho Y, Song RJ, Gagnon DR, Cho K et al. Diabetes Mellitus–Related All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in a National Cohort of Adults. J Am Heart Assoc. 201919;8(4):e011295.

  3. Michaelidou M, Pappachan JM, Jeeyavudeen MS. Management of diabesity: current concepts. World J Diabetes. 2023;14(4):396–411.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Vasanthakumar J, Kambar S. Prevalence of obesity among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in urban areas of Belagavi. Indian J Heal Sci Biomed Res Kleu. 2020;13(1).

  5. Anjana RM, Unnikrishnan R, Deepa M, Pradeepa R, Tandon N, Das AK, et al. Metabolic non-communicable disease health report of India: the ICMR-INDIAB National cross-sectional study (ICMR-INDIAB-17). Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023;11(7):474–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Samson SL, Vellanki P, Blonde L, Christofides EA, Galindo RJ, Hirsch IB, et al. American association of clinical endocrinology consensus statement: comprehensive type 2 diabetes management Algorithm – 2023 update. Endocr Pract. 2023;29(5):305–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Summary Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024. Diabetes Care [Internet]. 2023. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2337/dc24-SREV. Accessed 12 Dec 2024.

  8. Wing RR, Lang W, Wadden TA, Safford M, Knowler WC, Bertoni AG, et al. Benefits of modest weight loss in improving cardiovascular risk factors in overweight and obese individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(7):1481–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Li G, Zhang P, Wang J, An Y, Gong Q, Gregg EW, et al. Cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and diabetes incidence after lifestyle intervention for people with impaired glucose tolerance in the Da Qing diabetes prevention study: a 23-year follow-up study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2(6):474–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mertens IL, Van Gaal LF. Overweight, obesity, and blood pressure: the effects of modest weight reduction. Obes Res. 2000;8(3):270–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kahan S, Fujioka K. Obesity pharmacotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Spectr. 2017;30(4):250–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Davies MJ, Bergenstal R, Bode B, Kushner RF, Lewin A, Skjøth TV, et al. Efficacy of liraglutide for weight loss among patients with type 2 diabetes: the SCALE diabetes randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(7):687–99. A.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pi-Sunyer X, Astrup A, Fujioka K, Greenway F, Halpern A, Krempf M, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of 3.0 mg of liraglutide in weight management. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(1):11–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. le Roux C, Aroda V, Hemmingsson J, Cancino AP, Christensen R, Pi-Sunyer X. Comparison of efficacy and safety of liraglutide 3.0 mg in individuals with BMI above and below 35 kg/m2: A Post-hoc analysis. Obes Facts. 2017;10(6):531–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mehta A, Marso SP, Neeland IJ. Liraglutide for weight management: a critical review of the evidence. Obes Sci Pract. 2017;3(1):3–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Krishnan K, Raman S, Anand Moses CR, Rajesh RP, Gupta A, Mudaliar V, et al. Phase 3 efficacy and safety trial of proposed liraglutide biosimilar for reduction of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2024;207:111034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chou C-A, Chuang S-F. Evaluation of the efficacy of low-dose liraglutide in weight control among Taiwanese non-diabetes patients. J Diabetes Investig. 2020;11(6):1524–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang D, Li Y, Lee SG, Wang L, Fan J, Zhang G, et al. Ethnic differences in body composition and obesity related risk factors: study in Chinese and white males living in China. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(5):e19835.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sargeant JA, Henson J, King JA, Yates T, Khunti K, Davies MJ. A review of the effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 receptor agonists and Sodium-Glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on lean body mass in humans. Endocrinol Metab. 2019;34(3):247–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kalra S, Mithal A, Zargar AH, Sethi B, Dharmalingam M, Ghosh S, et al. Indian phenotype characteristics among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: insights from a Non-interventional nationwide registry in India. TouchREVIEWS Endocrinol. 2022;18(1):63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Narayan KMV, Kanaya AM. Why are South Asians prone to type 2 diabetes? A hypothesis based on underexplored pathways. Diabetologia. 2020;63(6):1103–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Anjana RM, Shanthi Rani CS, Deepa M, Pradeepa R, Sudha V, Divya Nair H, et al. Incidence of diabetes and prediabetes and predictors of progression among Asian Indians: 10-Year Follow-up of the Chennai urban rural epidemiology study (CURES). Diabetes Care. 2015;38(8):1441–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nagarathna R, Madhava M, Patil SS, Singh A, Perumal K, Ningombam G, et al. Cost of management of diabetes mellitus: A Pan India study. Ann Neurosci. 2020;27(3–4):190–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

We thank both Levim Biotech LLP & BIRAC (Biotech Industry Research Assistance Council) of DBT, GOI for their financial assistance with respect to the conduct of Liraglutide Biosimilar Phase III clinical trial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Manipal Hospitals, Kolkata, India

    Sujoy Ghosh

  2. Care Hospitals, Hyderabad, India

    Bipin Sethi

  3. Bharti Research Institute of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Karnal, India

    Sanjay Kalra

  4. Apollo Hospitals, Guwahati, India

    Manash P. Baruah

  5. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, India

    Abhishek Mane, Sanjay Choudhari, Anup Petare, Mayur Jadhav, Saiprasad Patil & Hanmant Barkate

Authors
  1. Sujoy Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bipin Sethi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sanjay Kalra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Manash P. Baruah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Abhishek Mane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sanjay Choudhari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Anup Petare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mayur Jadhav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  9. Saiprasad Patil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  10. Hanmant Barkate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Name of the author Types of contribution Dr Sujoy Ghosh Conceptualization of the Manuscript and review Dr Bipin Sethi Conceptualization of the Manuscript and review Dr Sanjay Kalra Conceptualization of the Manuscript and review Dr Manash Baruah Conceptualization of the Manuscript and review Dr Abhishek Mane Manuscript writing and review Dr Sanjay Choudhari Manuscript writing and review Dr Anup Petare Manuscript writing and review Dr Mayur Jadhav Manuscript writing and review Dr Saiprasad Patil Manuscript review Dr Hanmant Barkate Manuscript review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjay Choudhari.

Ethics declarations

Human ethics and consent to participate declarations

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghosh, S., Sethi, B., Kalra, S. et al. Effect of liraglutide biosimilar vs. reference liraglutide on weight reduction in T2DM patients with obesity: post hoc analysis of phase III trial. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. – Endocrinol. Rep. 11, 6 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40842-025-00219-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40842-025-00219-7

Keywords

Cardiovascular Diabetology – Endocrinology Reports

ISSN: 3059-4057

Contact us